Amazon Aurora vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.6. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.7% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Amazon Aurora

Read 20 Amazon Aurora reviews

1,648 Views
1,615 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 21 Oracle MySQL Cloud Service reviews

477 Views
239 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Amazon Aurora

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and Amazon Aurora compete in the cloud-based database solutions category, each targeting distinct organizational needs. Amazon Aurora seems to have the upper hand due to its superior scalability and performance.

Features: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers robust data management, seamless Oracle ecosystem integration, and strong support channels. Amazon Aurora features high availability, automatic scaling, and deep integration with AWS services, appealing to users seeking an AWS-centric solution.

Room for Improvement: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service could enhance interoperability with non-Oracle products and improve scalability for dynamic workloads. It might also benefit from streamlined maintenance operations. Amazon Aurora could improve cost efficiency for smaller setups, enhance user-friendliness for AWS newcomers, and provide greater transparency in pricing models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers straightforward deployment with extensive Oracle support. Amazon Aurora benefits from a highly automated deployment process and easily integrates with AWS management tools, providing a smooth experience for AWS-seasoned teams.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service provides cost-effective options with flexible pricing plans, ensuring a predictable investment and prompt ROI. Amazon Aurora, though potentially higher in initial costs, justifies its expense with performance efficiency and low maintenance, promising long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,019 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Aurora

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon Aurora is 2.7%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon Aurora	2.7%
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service	0.5%
Other	96.8%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Adnan Shafiq

Associate Vice President - Database Management (Principal Solutions Architect) at Northbay

High availability and geographical redundancy ensure reliable performance and cost efficiency

Amazon Aurora provides up to fifteen to sixteen read replicas. It replicates data across multiple Availability Zones, ensuring high availability and geographical redundancy, which can be considered a GR instead of a DR. As a managed service, maintenance tasks like backup and restore are handled by AWS, saving my organization significant time and money. Additionally, its fast cloning feature allows us to create a new clone from a large database swiftly, similar to a zero-copy cloning feature in Snowflake. This makes Amazon Aurora a compelling choice for my organization.

Read full review

Raghuram K M

Chief Technology Officer at Prognosys Medical Systems

Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console

I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Amazon Aurora is SQL standardization, it doesn't have its own syntax which is good. It has a lot of hands-off self-management type of activities, such as log rolling and auto-scaling."

"My overall experience with Amazon Aurora is very positive. I rate it ten out of ten for its reliability and efficiency."

"We had better control over the parameters that we could tweak in terms of intermediate storage and better indexing capabilities."

"One of the standout features of Amazon Aurora is that we do not need to maintain disaster recovery or manage availability zones."

"Aurora's features that I find the most beneficial include its database backup strategy, performance options, and input-output operations."

"The solution’s scalability is good since we don’t need to take a maintenance window during unpredictable workloads. I like the solution’s behind-the-scenes happenings. It is a great feature."

"Amazon Aurora is built on community databases and AWS has added additional features to it, allowing customers to have enterprise-level features at a lower cost."

"One of the most valuable features is storage scaling."

More Amazon Aurora pros

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"All the features are excellent."

"The solution's performance is good."

"The most valuable feature is the data aggregation function."

"The solution overall is very, very good. It's got good integration with other databases and adds new features often."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to manage and install."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to use and implement."

"It is an established open-source database with a vast array of resources available, ensuring you can learn everything needed."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

Cons

"I would like to see more AI-related features in future releases."

"The product's distributed query process for MySQL needs improvement."

"It is a bit costly. The features are quite good, and I wouldn't say it requires any technical improvements. But from a cost perspective, some clients wouldn't go for Aurora because of that."

"Room for improvement might be in the UI, integrations, or data working capabilities for better user experience."

"In Oracle, tools like Veridata allow for comparing databases and certifying data accuracy, even offering repair capabilities, which are missing in Aurora. There should be a similar comparison tool in Aurora."

"The pricing could improve. It should be reduced."

"It would have been helpful if they had provided some benchmarking numbers."

"While Amazon Aurora meets your current scaling and storage needs, there is room for improvement in cryptography and scalability compared to other databases."

More Amazon Aurora cons

"Sometimes MySQL does upgrades on the server. When we are still using the old server and when they integrate the upgrade, they don't carry along some of the old syntaxes. The versions don't sync."

"There could be improvements, particularly in Firebird, where the indexing is limited to just a single B-tree index, leading to poor performance for large-scale queries."

"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions."

"In a production environment, upgrading from a lower to an upper version is a very long process that needs to be improved."

"The tool’s stability must be improved."

"There might be minor improvements, however, I can’t identify any particular areas for improvement at the moment."

"The product has many bugs."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"The price could be lower compared to its competitors."

"It is quite expensive."

"The tool’s pricing depends on the instance type. For cost optimization purposes, we use the result instance category."

"There is no need to buy a license for the product. We can pay as per the use case."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"The license is expensive."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

"It is an open-source product."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"The product is expensive."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,019 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Aurora?

Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Aurora?

The pricing for Amazon Aurora is different from DocumentDB because DocumentDB is cheaper. However, when you manage the administration more closely, you can control costs better with Amazon Aurora. ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Aurora?

I would like to see some tutorials from Amazon for Aurora because I'm too new to it. I believe Amazon can make more tutorials for the product since there's a lot of reading required, and a short tu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

See all answers

Comparisons

SQL Server vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Database vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 13% of the time

MariaDB vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 9% of the time

CockroachDB vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 7% of the time

SingleStore vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon Aurora Competitors

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 32% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 24% of the time

PostgreSQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 23% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora

October 2025

Download Amazon Aurora product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

October 2025

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Overview

Amazon Aurora is a MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud, that combines the performance and availability of traditional enterprise databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases.

Amazon Aurora is up to five times faster than standard MySQL databases and three times faster than standard PostgreSQL databases. It provides the security, availability, and reliability of commercial databases at 1/10th the cost. Amazon Aurora is fully managed by Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS), which automates time-consuming administration tasks like hardware provisioning, database setup, patching, and backups.

Amazon Aurora features a distributed, fault-tolerant, self-healing storage system that auto-scales up to 64TB per database instance. It delivers high performance and availability with up to 15 low-latency read replicas, point-in-time recovery, continuous backup to Amazon S3, and replication across three Availability Zones (AZs).

Visit the Amazon RDS Management Console to create your first Aurora database instance and start migrating your MySQL and PostgreSQL databases.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Dow Jones, Arizona State University, Verizon, Capital One, United Nations, Nielsen, Autodesk, Fanduel

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

September 2025

Free Report: Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,019 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.